Wpływ stosowanej technologii uprawy i udziału pszenżyta ozimego w mieszankach na architekturę łanu
Ładowanie...
Data
2010
Autorzy
Starczewski, Józef
Bombik, Antoni
Czarnocki, Szymon
Tytuł czasopisma
ISSN czasopisma
Tytuł tomu
Wydawca
Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Zachodniopomorskiego Uniwersytetu Technologicznego w Szczecinie
Abstrakt
A field experiment was conducted in the years 2004–2007 at the Experimental Farm
in Zawady owned by the University of Podlasie. The experiment was a split-block design. The
following factors were examined in the study: triticale proportion in a mixture and cultivation system.
Variance analysis associated with the design was performed and means were separated
using the Tukey’s test.The studies indicated that different cultivation systems had no significant
influence on canopy architecture. Triticale proved to be more competitive than wheat although,
when cultivated in mixture with rye, it did not manage to outcompete wheat. The greatest number
of ears was harvested from mono-cropped plots and the plots under the mixture with equal
shares of triticale and wheat. The longest were the stems of plants harvested in the year 2005
and plants cultivated in two- or three-species mixtures with a 50% share of rye. The presence in
mixture of much longer rye plants resulted in increased average ear length. However, the differences
were significant only for mono-cropped rye; an interaction of mixture type and cultivation
system was significant, too. The greatest grain number in an ear resulted from the largest
spikelet number. Significantly greater was the number of grains in ears from plots under rye cultivated
in mixture with triticale.
Opis
Słowa kluczowe
architektura łanu, mieszanki zbożowe, pszenżyto ozime, technologia uprawy, canopy architekture, cultivation system, mixtures of cereals, winter triticale
Cytowanie
Starczewski J., Bombik A., Czarnocki S. (2010). Wpływ stosowanej technologii uprawy i udziału pszenżyta ozimego w mieszankach na architekturę łanu. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin. 2010, Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 276 (13), 47–54. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12539/1018